August 28, 2002

John Robb Responds to Shirky on Scaling

Robb makes the case that weblogs will (and do) scale more effectively than discussion groups:

Too much input is exactly the reason that discussion groups can't scale. A serial thread on a topic with a million contributors swamps a discussion. As a reader, I can't find the good posts in massive discussion group or mailing list. The signal-to-noise ratio is much too low.



However, weblogs change the equation. Each contributor gets a space where they can express their ideas. Their contributions aren't buried under the weight of the community's contributions in their personal space. The central hub of a weblog community provides a way to find these personal spaces, with each personal space acting as a filter or proxy for thousands of other sources. As the community scales the number of potential connections balloons. It isn't a broadcast system with one source of content, it is decentralized system with millions of sources. It is a marketplace for ideas and insight. By subscribing to a particular weblog, I am opting to transact with their idea flow without the noise of other voices.

(That's not the half of it.)
Follow the link for the rest of the argument.

Posted by xian at August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
Other incoming links (via Technorati)

Hosted by Mediajunkie.

Sponsors
On this day in 2003
The business of blogging is business: Ross Mayfield has posted a long, considered rebuttal to the Business 2.0 article on business blogging. In it, he cites Up2Speed's take on the same article. The area of general agreement among all parties is that blogging-about-blogging (metablogging) is "inside baseball" and not indicative of the future of the form. So... (Weblog Concepts)
Self-referential? Moi?: David Weinberger questions an assertion in an (inaccessible) Business 2.0 article that top-tier webloggers write too much about themselves. He counters with the conversational nature of most blogging. As for me... uh, who cares what I think?... (Weblog Concepts)