September 10, 2003

Google to make Blogger Pro free

According to Ev, Blogger Pro's features will be folded into the free version of Blogger.

Ev: "Google has lots of computers and bandwidth. And Google believes blogs are important and good for the web."

Susan Mernit asks these questions about the announcement:

  1. Is this the rich company Microsoft-like tactic of offering a free product that will undercut people trying to charge?
  2. Is this an expression of the belief, "We're no longer in the product development business, the real money is in selling ads on this thing - and everywhere else in the universe for that matter?"
  3. Or is it a corporate branding issue - i.e., Google does not charge for premium services. It makes its money from search results and paid search and ad word placements. Therefore a product offered by Google should fit into those models.
  4. Or it it they're so loaded they don't give a %$%K ? ( I don't believe that one.)

She thinks its No. 2.

After my hour on blogs and RSS yesterday at Seybold, one of the questions I got was about why Google may have bought Pyra and exactly this question of whether they were planning to monetize it somehow. I explained my theory that:

  • Google values the "memex" trails that bloggers leave as they provide custom indexes of the Web, filtered with a human perspective
  • And, with a BlogThis! button on Googlebar 2.0 and AdSense, Google is approaching a very tightly held content input, indexing, and retreival infrastructure with a financial component. A barrier to entry of even a small payment doesn't help them.

Still, I wouldn't rule out Susan's explanation No. 1, despite Google's "don't be evil" dictum, (which Craig Newmark quoted yesterday in his personable and well received talk about what he's learned from Craigslist and how it fosters a community of trust).

Posted by xian at September 10, 2003 9:26 AM

As I see it, options 1, 2 and 3 are not mutually exclusive. I see option two as primary, with options 1 and 3 being corollaries or adjuncts.

One can't expect to make an unlimited amount of advertising dollars (option 2) by being evil (option 1).

Corporate branding (option 3) is that which results from a specific, coordinated approach to option 2.

Posted by: Rayne at September 10, 2003 3:26 PM

Too bad the product is below sub par. They have a lot of slack to pick up on movabletype.

Posted by: Monkeyspit at September 10, 2003 6:03 PM

i want to make radio

Posted by: khalil at February 25, 2004 3:29 AM
Other incoming links (via Technorati)

Hosted by Mediajunkie.

Sponsors
On this day in 2002
Slashdot Review of 'Essential Blogging': Alexander Moskalyuk reviews the new O'Reilly Essential Blogging, saying it doesn't pass the "who would buy this book" test: The book seems to be just a quick walk-through of the manuals, and if you consider that all of the reviewed products have pretty good help and FAQ sections, the need for... (Weblog Concepts)
filchyboy Seeing Double?: I've noticed in the Salon blog rankings that filchyboy is listed twice. What's up with that? Is John the Maiden broadcasting now to two different usernums? It tends to lower his rank. I notice I am posting more about Salon blogs while traveling. Probably a neighborhood thing. It's easy for me... (Salon Bloggers)
Salon Blog Bites Back: She's Actual Size, Nationwide, Believe refuses to take criticism from our Blogistan Baedecker lying down: Re: Viva Hate! Usually I don't stoop to this level, but it's been a rough day and I'm in the mood: This Self-Righteous Prat has decided that my little corner of blogspace is one of his... (Salon Bloggers)
Conason Defends Sullivan: In Joe Conason's Journal (that's a link to the day — without permalinks it's not a real blog...) he defends Andrew Sullivan's new column in Salon against readers threatening to cancel their subscriptions: While I don't share some writers' obssesion with exposing Sullivan, I haven't hesitated to expose his errors and... (Salon Bloggers)
Who Sold 'All Together Now' to Verizon?: Can I assume we have Michael Jackson to blame for the insipid rendition of the Beatles' song "All Together Now" I just heard in a Verizon ad? Here in NY the media introspection on the upcoming anniversary beats like a drum.... (Miscellany)