January 5, 2004

We treat non sequiturs as spam

A bit of administrivia: If you drop by this weblog and leave a random-sounding comment on some old entry, chances are I will simply assume you are spamming us and delete the comment and ban you forthwith.

This morning I deleted just such a message. The site linked didn't seem especially unpleasant (that is, it wasn't pr0n), but there was no connection at all to the post it commented on and the message itself was brief and generic. Given the proliferation of comment spam, I will err on the side of deleting in cases like this.

Posted by xian at January 5, 2004 9:57 AM

I've been noticing those weird comments, too. No links to pr0n or pill pushers, just odd little comments. After hesitating a while, I decided to do what you do--I delete them. I've also begun turning off comments on the old entries that seem to be drawing comment spam.

Posted by: chujoe at January 5, 2004 2:47 PM

Hm. My first reaction to this post was, "Did I post a strange, incomprehensible comment here recently?". I don't think I did, but even so, it brings to mind a question:

Would blog spam be a problem if the contents of the URL field weren't put into a link tag, but instead displayed in text on the page?

Posted by: Richard Soderberg at January 7, 2004 12:00 PM

Banned? My comments are always random sounding. One site banned the comment "interesting". Sometimes that all I can think of to say. As a courtesy I was just letting them know I had read it and was still thinking.

It's not easy to recognize "spam" is it? I also thought that six Persian blogs that started coming in suddenly were spammers. I couldn't read their site and they all came in so suddenly. I removed them from the referrer list.

Then I was ashamed when another came in and I saw this glowing dotted box code with Arabic writing inside. The other sites had little html and css tricks we had demonstrated. Now I realize they were simply telling their friends about us and using some copy-and-paste code. I learned a lesson. Yours may be more obvious, this was just my experience and my mistake.

Nice place you have here.

Posted by: meg at January 8, 2004 8:08 AM

This morning I got one from jesusisreligion dot com. It did relate in a superficial way to the post but still felt like a veiled attempt to get their site linked to. The target wasn't a commercial site, but ideological. Is that still spam?

I deleted it on the basis that it was still an attempt to game the system.

Posted by: Scot Hacker at January 11, 2004 1:18 PM
Other incoming links (via Technorati)

Hosted by Mediajunkie.

Sponsors
On this day in 2005
Visualizing del.icio.us tags: Kevan Davis examines his own entrails and built a little tool to examine those of others. Witness Xian's rather sparse ones (above) compared to Tom Coate's rather messy entrails. Flickr has a pool.... (Blogosphere)
On this day in 2003
Another blogger upside story: I think we need to coin yet another neologism, perhaps "blogvertigo" for that swoon a blogger feels when starting down another one of those endlessly branching (till the browser crashes) web expeditions while trying to decide what to save and what to comment on. Next thing you know you're at BoingBoing... (Weblog Concepts)
John Edwards is the Grisham candidate: Too lazy to pad out to my front drive and pick up the Sunday Chronicle, I've been reading New York Times op eds and now skimming Slate. There's a tight little William Saletan article from Thursday, Wise Counsel - Edwards copies Clinton's message—in invisible ink, that makes the point that John... (Memes)
What has Iraq got that North Korea hasn't?: In his op ed today, A War for Oil?, Tom Friedman mentions the president's recent soundbite:Mr. Bush's recent attempt to hype the Iraqi threat by saying that an Iraqi attack on America — which is most unlikely — "would cripple our economy" was embarrassing. It made the president look as if... (Miscellany)
Chatterbox adopts 'Meme Watch' term: It looks like Slate launched a feature called Meme Watch back in November and refers, semifacetiously, to a MemeTracker™ device. Hey, as long as they pay us royalties! No, honestly, the more of us tracking memes the better. Timothy Noah's latest column observes the ups and downs of the "Lucky Duckies"... (Memes)